Back to the profile

🇱🇺 Roeser: the verdict, plainly

What the tables imply but never say — what Roeser asks you to accept, and what it gives back.

Roeser charges for its position: you get to work fast, and the rent lets you know.

With 7,193 inhabitants, Roeser scores 4.9 out of 10 overall, which puts it mid-table of the 127 profiled cities. Its rent of 28.1 €/m² is lower than in 13% of them, and its 23-minute peak commute shorter than in 95%.

Its strengths: Luxembourg commute (7.0) and transport (6.8). Its weak point: cost of living, at 3.5 — and since the overall score applies a worst-axis penalty, that weakness weighs more than a plain average would suggest.

On the Luxembourg side the daily trip costs nothing: public transport is free across the whole country, and the only price of the journey is time.

What carries it

Luxembourg commute7.0
Transport6.8
Remote work6.2

What holds it back

Cost of living3.5
Nature4.1
Culture & going out4.6

Where it sits in the area

13 %

cheaper than of the profiled cities

95 %

closer than of the profiled cities

Cities in a comparable position

Similar rent and similar commute — the direct alternatives worth weighing.

This text is assembled automatically from the calibrated scores and the public data on this page. It is no substitute for a visit.