π The most built-up communes
Little green space within walking distance, a dense fabric, or an industrial past still legible in the landscape.
The other side
The Greater Region is small: forest or the Moselle are rarely more than twenty minutes away.
27 communes affected Β· 21% of the perimeter
The communes affected
| City | What trips it | Quality-of-life score |
|---|---|---|
| π±πΊ StrassenLuxembourg Canton | 3.5 | 5.8 |
| π±πΊ BertrangeLuxembourg Canton | 3.3 | 5.6 |
| π±πΊ Esch-sur-AlzetteEsch-sur-Alzette Canton | 3.0 | 5.1 |
| π±πΊ DudelangeEsch-sur-Alzette Canton | 3.5 | 5.1 |
| π±πΊ BettembourgEsch-sur-Alzette Canton | 3.3 | 5.1 |
| π±πΊ RumelangeEsch-sur-Alzette Canton | 3.0 | 4.9 |
| π±πΊ SandweilerLuxembourg Canton | 3.5 | 4.8 |
| π±πΊ SanemEsch-sur-Alzette Canton | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| π±πΊ MondercangeEsch-sur-Alzette Canton | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| π±πΊ DifferdangeEsch-sur-Alzette Canton | 3.3 | 4.2 |
| π±πΊ SchifflangeEsch-sur-Alzette Canton | 2.7 | 3.8 |
| π±πΊ PΓ©tangeEsch-sur-Alzette Canton | 2.7 | 3.7 |
| π§πͺ MessancyLuxembourg Province (Belgium) | 3.5 | 3.7 |
| π«π· MetzMoselle (France) | 3.3 | 3.6 |
| π«π· Hettange-GrandeMoselle (France) | 2.7 | 3.6 |
| π«π· YutzMoselle (France) | 2.5 | 3.3 |
| π«π· ThionvilleMoselle (France) | 2.7 | 3.2 |
| π§πͺ AubangeLuxembourg Province (Belgium) | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| π«π· CattenomMoselle (France) | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| π«π· Audun-le-TicheMoselle (France) | 2.5 | 2.7 |
| π«π· LongwyMeurthe-et-Moselle (France) | 2.7 | 2.4 |
| π«π· Mont-Saint-MartinMeurthe-et-Moselle (France) | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| π«π· VilleruptMeurthe-et-Moselle (France) | 2.5 | 2.4 |
| π«π· HayangeMoselle (France) | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| π«π· FlorangeMoselle (France) | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| π«π· FameckMoselle (France) | 1.9 | 2.4 |
| π«π· LonguyonMeurthe-et-Moselle (France) | 3.3 | 2.4 |
Thresholds are set once and applied to all 127 communes without exception. A point to watch describes a trade-off, not a defect: that is what the βother sideβ line is for.